Larian Studios
Posted By: maddmannmatt Who thinks... - 17/06/03 09:31 PM
Who here thinks <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/div.gif" alt="" /> or <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/riftrunner.gif" alt="" /> should have an online version? <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/think.gif" alt="" />
Posted By: Rose Re: Who thinks... - 17/06/03 09:37 PM
This has been discussed extensively -- but let me just say that I don't want to see it online. Multiplayer, perhaps, but not online. I'd much rather chew my hands off than play against a l33t haxx0r kiddie who has somehow figured out a way to get a 1300 level hero wielding a sword that does 40000 damage per hit. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/down.gif" alt="" />
Posted By: Darkfall Re: Who thinks... - 17/06/03 10:42 PM
you put the words right out of my mouth, i totaly agree with you <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/up.gif" alt="" />
Posted By: LewsTherinKinslayer13 Re: Who thinks... - 18/06/03 12:13 AM
sorry. my bad tember. editing it now.
Posted By: Darkfall Re: Who thinks... - 18/06/03 09:52 AM
Let me make one thing clear, i agree with Rose, and not with the multiplay thing. (just to be sure) <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/delight.gif" alt="" />
<img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/ouch.gif" alt="" />
Posted By: Kejero Re: Who thinks... - 18/06/03 10:18 AM
Mr Old Hand, having such a status you should know by now that cursing like that is not much appreciated around here <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/think.gif" alt="" /> -- The guy just asked a question that's been asked a million times before... It's not like he blew up your pc <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/rolleyes.gif" alt="" />

PS - MaddMannMatt, if you're not a guy, excuse me <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/biggrin.gif" alt="" /> It's just a wild guess <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/winkwink.gif" alt="" />
Posted By: Egin Re: Who thinks... - 18/06/03 10:29 AM
Agree with Kajero.
This search engine doesn't work correctly imo.
And, noone harmed from that this guy asked this question one more time.
But, you are making him feel unhappy posting here his thoughts.
Even if he wanted just say something, and hope that someone responds, even then, you are still loyal and very patient old hand <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> right?
Posted By: ZlotY Re: Who thinks... - 18/06/03 10:41 AM
Quote
Agree with Kajero.
This search engine doesn't work correctly imo.
And, noone harmed from that this guy asked this question one more time.
But, you are making him feel unhappy posting here his thoughts.
Even if he wanted just say something, and hope that someone responds, even then, you are still loyal and very patient old hand <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> right?


Fully agreed.Not status but Your posts make You see who You really are
Posted By: Lynn Re: Who thinks... - 18/06/03 12:09 PM
True true.
Anybody in here can ask anything he/she wants, anytime... <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/think.gif" alt="" />
Anyway, as long as it sticks to the board rules <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/winkwink.gif" alt="" />
And pref. in the right forum <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/biggrin.gif" alt="" />
Posted By: Rose Re: Who thinks... - 18/06/03 03:06 PM
You people are too nice and welcoming to newbies. I've never seen a forum that is so open and friendly, and I frequent a number of them.

What is the matter with you all?! <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/winkwink.gif" alt="" />

I joke, I joke. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/delight.gif" alt="" />
Posted By: Shyon Re: Who thinks... - 18/06/03 03:13 PM
Quote
Who here thinks <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/div.gif" alt="" /> or <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/riftrunner.gif" alt="" /> should have an online version?


I think that too, it would be better, without cheats off course, you can ask for help, and do a lot of things, and find better itens only in online games and blalblbbalbalbalblba. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/biggrin.gif" alt="" /> The online version is good idea, but <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/div.gif" alt="" /> is only for single because the style of the game, now <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/riftrunner.gif" alt="" /> i don't know because is only preview at now.

If you want a online game we can play Diablo2(without hacks and cheats).

That's great, now i'm a journeyman, journeyman, journeyman, journeyman <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/stupid.gif" alt="" />
Posted By: Shyon Re: Who thinks... - 18/06/03 03:27 PM
Quote
This has been discussed extensively -- but let me just say that I don't want to see it online. Multiplayer, perhaps, but not online. I'd much rather chew my hands off than play against a l33t haxx0r kiddie who has somehow figured out a way to get a 1300 level hero wielding a sword that does 40000 damage per hit.



40.000 damage - only for hacks and cheaters.

Example - Diablo 2

My damage at lvl 68 - Bow Amazon(my bow isn't so good) - 300 - 1120
Paladin(My axe is awesome) damage at lvl 58 - with right skills can be
400 - 1900 (and i only played in single player with all characters, multiplayer only for batles or help someone.


Now, hack example

Druid lvl 32 with death ring(hack) - defense 60.000 life 80.000 damage 64.980 - one hit for kill.

I fight against my friend(he with hack(death ring) and me without, he lvl 32, me lvl 54, he don't kill my char, but I don't kill his char too. I hit him 1000000000000000000000 X and he don't die, but he can't kill me to, because my good skills. But it's not fair. Because I can beat him with one hit in the reality.
Posted By: Carrie Re: Who thinks... - 18/06/03 05:53 PM
Well, i don't think it should ever go on line.
I think it should stay single player...the first one was such a success, why fix it if it is not broken?
@Lews - the only reason you have an old hand title is through spamming, and posting on everything you see. Titles don't have a thing to do with how much knowledge you have, or how long you have been on the forum.
Posted By: Shyon Re: Who thinks... - 18/06/03 06:27 PM
Quote
Titles don't have a thing to do with how much knowledge you have, or how long you have been on the forum.



I agree with you Carrie. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/biggrin.gif" alt="" />

Posted By: Jurak Re: Who thinks... - 18/06/03 07:35 PM
yep <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/biggrin.gif" alt="" /> it takes intelligence to show.........intelligence? <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/think.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/ouch.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/biggrin.gif" alt="" />
Posted By: Shyon Re: Who thinks... - 18/06/03 09:53 PM
That's right Jurak it takes intelligence to show intelligence and more, ok for the truth that's is just a test of mine, don't forget if someone wants to play diablo2 PM me and we will kill everybody. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/biggrin.gif" alt="" />
Posted By: LewsTherinKinslayer13 Re: Who thinks... - 19/06/03 02:20 AM
now u've all humbled me; I'm disgraced. and no, I don't post everything I see.
Posted By: Jurak Re: Who thinks... - 19/06/03 02:42 AM
Quote
Who here thinks <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/div.gif" alt="" /> or <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/riftrunner.gif" alt="" /> should have an online version? <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/think.gif" alt="" />


It actually would be a fairly good marketing tactic!...and....
..definetly widen the possible audience

I wouldn't play it, for some reasons listed here......BuT,

probably a lot of other people who would,...
that like that type of gaming,
so in retrospect...
i think it may very well be, not a bad idea! <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/idea.gif" alt="" /> ....
......as long as it doesn't affect "me and my game" <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/biggrin.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif" alt="" />

Posted By: ILoveBethany Re: Who thinks... - 19/06/03 05:11 AM
I would definitely be interested in a multiplayer <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/div.gif" alt="" />. It would be fun if we could interact with other people from across the world. [Linked Image] I think that if our characters were saved online instead of on our pc, it would be harder for cheaters to cheat. In Diablo2 [Linked Image] I have yet to run into a level 32 Druid with one hit kill on closed b.net.

However, in order for an online <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/div.gif" alt="" /> to be successful, I think there must be some new revisions to add characters classes/races, change of clothing, more skills [Linked Image] and such to have more diversity. I know you guys have all read the forums about these so I won't go into detail. Lalala. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/silly.gif" alt="" />
Posted By: LewsTherinKinslayer13 Re: Who thinks... - 20/06/03 01:38 AM
maybe we could have the worlds in <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/riftrunner.gif" alt="" /> but we could rift to the <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/div.gif" alt="" /> worlds (rivertown, darkforest, ect.) and we could be in areas.and u could join with other people to work togeather to like buy castles like the imp castle. and u could pay gold to have npc's help ya.
Posted By: HandEFood Re: Who thinks... - 20/06/03 03:19 AM
Quote
Quote
Who here thinks <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/div.gif" alt="" /> or <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/riftrunner.gif" alt="" /> should have an online version? <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/think.gif" alt="" />


It actually would be a fairly good marketing tactic!...and....
..definetly widen the possible audience

And when the reveiwers rip the crap out of the multiplayer side of the game, who will buy it then? I have no problem with multiplayer games, but they take an extrodinary amount of work in network handling and game balancing. I think it is too big a job at the moment and that it will lower the overall quality of the game. It might sell a few more copies, but I'd rather be playing a quality RPG than an arena combat game posing as an RPG.
Posted By: anij Re: Who thinks... - 20/06/03 07:35 PM
I don't know which camp to stand in. I don't want the game to suck but I really like the social component of multi-player. There is no shortage of witty, intelligent people here who would enable one to feed their addiction while virtually de-hermitizing. (Actually, that's a frightening statement.)



Posted By: Jurak Re: Who thinks... - 20/06/03 08:26 PM
yes indeed ....sacry....but you may have a point there....if only the younger foolish ones...would take heed! <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/biggrin.gif" alt="" />
Posted By: LewsTherinKinslayer13 Re: Who thinks... - 21/06/03 01:59 AM
who's the younger foolish ones???
Posted By: little_t Re: Who thinks... - 26/09/05 12:55 PM
i would have to say yes with kevinslayer and it should only be multiplayer at the most but not Online!!!
Posted By: damyana Re: Who thinks... - 13/12/05 10:59 AM
I think it would be great to have the game(Divine Divinity) online or at least Multplayer. If there is an online game and it is a fail (and I think it wont be) then you can continiue playing single player. But sometimes people have to try new things - there's no life without risk (especially for the game studios!) <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/biggrin.gif" alt="" />
Posted By: TheDivine Re: Who thinks... - 13/12/05 11:19 AM
i say this again: a multiplayer would be really nice but make it NO MMORPG!
© Larian Studios forums