|
|
stranger
|
OP
stranger
Joined: Sep 2009
|
------------------ System Information ------------------ Time of this report: 9/3/2009, 02:11:49 Machine name: FLITWICK Operating System: Windows XP Home Edition (5.1, Build 2600) Service Pack 3 (2600.xpsp_sp3_gdr.090206-1234) Language: English (Regional Setting: English) System Manufacturer: Gateway System Model: E-6000 BIOS: Default System BIOS Processor: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz Memory: 1024MB RAM Page File: 1190MB used, 1270MB available Windows Dir: C:\WINDOWS DirectX Version: DirectX 9.0c (4.09.0000.0904) DX Setup Parameters: Not found DxDiag Version: 5.03.2600.5512 32bit Unicode DxDiag Previously: Crashed in system information (stage 3)
------------ DxDiag Notes ------------ DirectX Files Tab: No problems found. Display Tab 1: No problems found. Sound Tab 1: No problems found. Sound Tab 2: No problems found. Music Tab: No problems found. Input Tab: No problems found. Network Tab: No problems found.
-------------------- DirectX Debug Levels -------------------- Direct3D: 0/4 (n/a) DirectDraw: 0/4 (retail) DirectInput: 0/5 (n/a) DirectMusic: 0/5 (n/a) DirectPlay: 0/9 (retail) DirectSound: 0/5 (retail) DirectShow: 0/6 (retail)
--------------- Display Devices --------------- Card name: ATI Radeon 9600/9550/X1050 Series Manufacturer: ATI Technologies Inc. Chip type: ATI Radeon Graphics Processor AGP (0x4150) DAC type: Internal DAC(400MHz) Device Key: Enum\PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_4150&SUBSYS_200217EE&REV_00 Display Memory: 256.0 MB Current Mode: 1152 x 864 (32 bit) (60Hz)
|
|
|
|
apprentice
|
apprentice
Joined: Aug 2009
|
I pretty much doubt it. Divinity 2 requires a Shader 3.0 compatible card.
Ich denke, also leide ich...
|
|
|
|
stranger
|
OP
stranger
Joined: Sep 2009
|
but wait... Card name: ATI Radeon 9600/9550/X1050 Series Manufacturer: ATI Technologies Inc. Chip type: ATI Radeon Graphics Processor AGP (0x4150) DAC type: Internal DAC(400MHz) Device Key: Enum\PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_4150&SUBSYS_200217EE&REV_00 Display Memory: 256.0 MB
Doest the Display memory 256 mean its a 3.0 shader? cause 128 is a 2.0 shader....
|
|
|
|
apprentice
|
apprentice
Joined: Aug 2009
|
No, that is the amount of memory the card has. Which has nothing to do with the shader version. Your card, as far as I remember, does not even support shader 2.0b, let alone 3.0. The ship is the same that was already used by the radeon 9600er series that came out ages ago.
Ich denke, also leide ich...
|
|
|
|
Support
|
Support
Joined: Mar 2003
|
Divinity II System RequirementsGamestar Review-Box Translation - near the end of the topic is a chart from GameStar.de with various CPU/GPU/RAM options, and how they would expect the game to run on that system (see the reply for a translation). A video card upgrade and perhaps another GB of RAM might get the game running, though I'm not sure how much the CPU being low would hurt performance. I doubt the CPU is upgradeable (if the motherboard supports anything faster it would probably be hard to find or fairly expensive, if not it would probably make more sense to get a new system than upgrade your current one). There may be a demo available sometime after the game is released, that you can test your system with. Welcome to the forum. 
|
|
|
|
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Dec 2003
|
Both video card and CPU don't meet the requirements. An ATI card needs to be at least of the X series, and your processor should be dual core...
|
|
|
|
veteran
|
veteran
Joined: Mar 2003
|
i think i'm safe for it, but there are a few things ihave doubts about.
i have a dual core 6320 @1.86g 2 g ram (vista) graphic card GeForce 8500 GT
Joliekiller, paladin on a crusade against (almost) all evil.
|
|
|
|
journeyman
|
journeyman
Joined: Jul 2009
|
i think i'm safe for it, but there are a few things ihave doubts about.
i have a dual core 6320 @1.86g 2 g ram (vista) graphic card GeForce 8500 GT Again, check chart: http://www.larian.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=369553&an=You are in the yellow zone i guess, 1024x768 with minimum detail settings, the graphic card is realy holding you back. Putting 1gb ram more, with a radeon 3870 its a very very cheap upgrade and would do wonders.
|
|
|
|
apprentice
|
apprentice
Joined: Aug 2009
|
i think i'm safe for it, but there are a few things ihave doubts about.
i have a dual core 6320 @1.86g 2 g ram (vista) graphic card GeForce 8500 GT Well, it should run, the question is how fast... The ram should be enough when you end all not absolutely necessary tasks and services before playing. If your cpu doesn't run the game with acceptable speed, a little overclocking should do the trick. The problem is your video card which is very slow. Lowest resolution and details and the game might run somehow. Just don't expect it to look nice or to run with acceptable speed....
Ich denke, also leide ich...
|
|
|
|
addict
|
addict
Joined: Oct 2004
|
Hmmmmm....I am lacking basically the double-core requirement. I've been able to get some double-core games running on my PC -- i.e. Prince of Persia (2008); Assassin's Creed; Saints Row 2.
My PC: --Win XP Home --Pentium 4 single-core 3.2 Ghz processor w/ Hyper-Threading --512 MB of GeForce 8800 GT (DDR3 RAM) --2 GB DDR2 RAM
Hmmmm....I wonder how the heck it'd run on my rig, when the game drops in the USA. Probably....on LOW to a few settings maybe on Medium?
EDIT: What's the lowest resolution supported by this game? 800x600? 1024x768?
Last edited by MysterD; 07/09/09 02:08 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|