however the english has to be standardised
British, please. Just to show that the Americans didn't win the "Bostoner Tea Party" that was no uproar against taxes but originally a linguistic debate between "z" and "s" fans <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/badsmile2.gif" alt="" />
Kiya
BTW, my English dictionary allows both words (3. ed 2003, 245000 keywords, 480000 phrases, 1663 pages):
Artefact/artifact, doesn't differ though if a blind passenger on that ship was by any chance a Latin professor who planned a crusade for the "i" or "e" skill paths <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/evilgrin1.gif" alt="" /> - "i" is originally the correct Latin origin from artificium.
My old Oxford (17. ed. 1972)one allows only "artifact" - so, my guess is... <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/think.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/delight.gif" alt="" />