Larian Banner: Baldur's Gate Patch 9
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#659230 28/02/20 12:31 AM
Joined: Feb 2020
stranger
OP Offline
stranger
Joined: Feb 2020
Is missed totally in the presented game.

The Baldurs Gate, Icewind Dale and Planescape Torments were based on dialogue options.
You could go through game like reading book. In PT you could even finish or loose the game with 3% of time spend on combat.
Then it was super translation to national languages with voices etc which was easy to people who dont know english.
Here in demo we can see only (Statistic): was said vs stat number vs roll. Which is uber limited and will end up in quicksave/quickload until all options will be checked to achieve the goal.

The aforementioned series had useful pause, which makes them different from i.e. Fallout series where your turn was started when NPCs from whole city done their turn. It was kinda frustrating and making game boring.

The BG and PT (especially Enhanced Editions) were also strongly based on team interaction: romances, dialogue options in certain places, animosities between team members. Here, we saw 4 team members, which greatly limits this interactions.

Times go on and I do not say it should be made the same way as was before. Infinity Engine and isometric view. But those 3 things above made aforementioned series great.

What was shown was DOS 3.0. Divinity series - very good imo - is based on possibilities and interactions with environment as was presented at PAX today.
Watching gameplay I had strong feeling I already saw this environment. This colours, this music, this interface and UI. It is typical for DOS. So the novelty factor or sentiment factor is totaly lost.

If this new game was called diferently and still in FR 5ed setup it would be great.
Doing it as Baldurs Gate 3 - so playing on sentiment of closed saga delivering DOS 3.0 in FR 5ed is just disappointing and with bad taste.

Unfortunately, in the my case and many others the hype train has stopped, which means no money from preorder.

Joined: Feb 2020
stranger
Offline
stranger
Joined: Feb 2020
I could not agree more. its a simple DOS 2 rip-off and no baldurs gate 3 at all smirk

Even the beginning (trailer) is lame and that does not sound like a good story at all. DOS 1+2 missed the fine immersion i felt while playing bg 1+2. Sad day !
And ofc. i won t buy it too. Dos 2 was a fail-buy.

Joined: Jun 2014
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: Jun 2014
Calling the intro cutscene "lame" is lying in the worst possible way.

Joined: Sep 2019
journeyman
Offline
journeyman
Joined: Sep 2019
This is DOS3. A good game but if the didn't slap the BG name on it you would never guess BG.

Joined: Jun 2019
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2019
Well, I would when it talks about the story taking place in baldur's gate and the city being attacked by mindflayers and the story also contained information alluding to bg1 and bg2.

It doesn't matter though, Larian is obligated to call it BG3 and not "A sweet-smelling rose".

Joined: Mar 2013
S
veteran
Offline
veteran
S
Joined: Mar 2013
whenever i read one of those threads something new pops up.

Since when was Icewind Dale a game that can be played like a book?
And since when did Icewind dale have good characters?

Icewind dale was a giant hack and slash , i liked it for that.
But come on.

Also, WOTC called up larian to make this didn tthey?
They saw divinity and said "make baldurs gate".
How is this anyone elses fault but WOTC

Last edited by Sordak; 28/02/20 05:11 PM.

Moderated by  Dom_Larian, Freddo, vometia 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5