DAD:
There is one great fallacy in both, the eternal darkness and the eternal life.
They both demand a continued perception after the death of all senses.
The modern man has to face the ultimate truth in which death is the anti-being.
Understanding consciousness is the core of this dilemma.
AlrikFassbauer:
Could you please explain what you mean with this ?
I'm used to longer texts by you, so I'm not quite satisfied here ...
There is great confusion between the concept of life and the concept of birth.
There is great confusion between the concept of death and the concept of transformation.
Seeds do not literally die but rather transform and in that sense the disappearance of a life form is not real death but an integral phase of life cycles.
It is false to assume life after death but it is valid to assume a variety of life phases.
The Christian religion in which I am quite versed teaches that what we perceive as death is only a change of phase in which a spirit takes off the material body and wears an immaterial body.
This implies that spirits can do things and sense but no where is there any proof of this speculation and no where is an account of senses based on immaterial worlds.
Information is carried through time-space as energy variations demanding a solid material to contain a liquid that contains a gas that contains energy to be modified accordingly and become formations of cognition.
The world of spirituality fails to explain how this could be without contradiction.
Life is one and it is materialistic and in which we may cognitively perceive light and darkness, awareness and dreams.
Death is one and it is immaterial and in which we are no more.
