"The part where we disagree is that I consider the question as one question, and you as two questions, right?"
It is one question (though functionally equivalent to two separate questions), but IMO not a valid yes/no question. I still don't see why a liar could not answer if the condition was not met; would that make the answer less of a lie?
"You can't consider
no answer as an answer"
It is an answer, though. In this case the question was specifically designed to ensure that.
"The second part of the question, is entirely connected to the first part."
No it isn't. A and B can be the same or different, completely independent of whether A tells the truth or not.
"The reasons why I posted that paradox:"
That is an interesting paradox, but you don't need a paradox to ask a question that can not be answered with a yes or no. ...
Yes, or no; have you stopped beating your spouse/mate/partner yet?
<img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif" alt="" />
"PS: I saw the part about glutton for punishment"
I realized after the fact it was rather silly to ask about the two guard/door riddle, then say it was pointless to continue the discussion (unless you were a glutton for punishment {to put that in context}), even if just teasing you about being wrong.
<img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/silly.gif" alt="" />
