<img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/offtopic.gif" alt="" />
Believe me buddy, you don't wanna know unless you're a philosopher or suicidal or both. I assume that you are.
If ethics is about what is right and wrong and so on and so forth, then meta ethics is about what we mean when we say that something is "right" or "wrong". Whether we ever can know if it is so, how we acquire that knowledge, whether there exist objective values etc.
It is like talking about talking about ethics.
And I'm writing about a bloke called Sayr-McCord and another one named Smith, and neither can keep their sentances shorter than one page a pop. Most words in one sentance wins. Excessive use of semi-colons, hyphens and brackets not necessary but certainly a plus.
<img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/offtopic.gif" alt="" />
