"...Frontiers are fix IMO, there is no necessity to discredit those with a differing opinion. E.g. => "worship a certain Dev" or "allow to be stripped of rights..." Kiya
I agree with you Kiya, that different opinions are bound to happen and we should all learn to live with the fact that the guy next to us may not think exactly like us. That said, the issue of rights is not so much an unreasonable idea when viewed upon the fair use principle under copyright law. This is something that legalist have fallen onto their quills over, as software companies rewrote what is considered fair use out from under the public when the public at large really didn't understand the issues at stake.
Consider that the idea of only one computer in a household being "licensed" to use a copy of software, that is if applied to any other media venue, would be viewed as patently ridiculous (eg. you buy a book but no one else in your house can read it except you, unless they pay for the book too).
And just because something is "legal" does not mean that it's ethical. Take the extension of the copy protection for the works under Disney's control. The US Congress extended that protection for an additional twenty years despite the long ago demise of Walt Disney, the creator of those works. It's as much to do with control and monopolization, as it is to foster creativity (the original intent of copyright law).
