Gamay must always prevail over grafics or multiplayer. Shur I would love to have a game with great gameplay and a addictive multiplayer section. I also Won't to conquer the world and invent a an clean alternative powersource and end human suffering.
As for the multiplayer section. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/beyond.gif" alt="" /> uses the same engine as <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/div.gif" alt="" /> and yes <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/div.gif" alt="" /> had multiplayer capabilities but they were removed since they didn't work as they should. Bassicly I am saying, if they wanted <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/beyond.gif" alt="" /> to have multiplayer they would have to rewrite a huge part of the game engine.
Don't forget that purpose of <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/beyond.gif" alt="" /> was to give the fans a a game while they are working on <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/div.gif" alt="" /> ˛ (that will have multiplayer capabilities) with a brand new engine (and full 3D). <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/beyond.gif" alt="" /> was actually somthing to brige the time between <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/div.gif" alt="" /> an <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/div.gif" alt="" />˛ otherwise the gap between games would be 6 or 7 years. A bit long IMO. I look at <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/beyond.gif" alt="" /> as a exagurated expansionpack.
Basicly your argument would be this if it was diablo.
Diablo LOD is bad because the grafics aren't improved since Diablo 2.
Sorry if I offend you thius not my intension but It seems that a huge part of the gamecommunity see <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/beyond.gif" alt="" /> as <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/div.gif" alt="" />˛. While Larian and all reviewer say it's not <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/div.gif" alt="" />˛
