I have an Idea of what I am talking about.... Name one nation in the history of time that its military used dual weapons and they defeated anything... No one.
Bekatowa doesnt exist I know, Its a cool word for Longsword. I have in my room a weapons and armor encyclopedia and the only thing labeled for use as an offhand weapon is the main gauche which is a puny .4 meters long thin little poking instrument.
Thourought all History, no one using dual weilding has ever prospered. Using two weapons guarentees. Less accuracy, more chance to screw up, using a weaker arm, ect ect....
I know what I am talking about once again. IM talkking about you pick up two Longswords (Bekatowa) and try figting with them. If you are lucky you wont stab yourself.
Using the slag term Bekatowa isnt hypocrosy... Thats using a slang term, lemme guess calling a Zweihander a Great sword is also hypocrasy??
NO I wassnt describing a fencing stance, Im saying if you have two weapons you want them to both be in arms reach of someone, as if you have one sword or a shield you will stand side ways so you can use your shield better.
I personally hate how fantasy games have things called shadow swords and stuff like that i wish there was a game with the least amount of that as possible.
Im saying a fancer using a Rapier, ya know when people didnt even wear armor anymore, would not be caught fighting a fully armored guy with a greatsword. That is the only situation where they would have an extreme speed advantage.
I didnt make a promise... I just said it, but I changed my mind. Or is that Hypocrasy too?
