No matter what I say, someone always makes something wrong out of it. I could say 2+2=4 and they will some how find some way to try and turn that on me to make themselves look smarter.
For example, on the TES forums, someone was reffering to a Ballista as a catapult, so I kindly corrected them saying what that Large Crossbow is is a Ballista and was used for direct fire against infantry, and then some smart [nocando] "creitan" posts saying. "Ballistas are Catapults, just like onagers and trebuchets. Anything that shoots projectiles at buildings is a catapult."
What kind of BS is that, now with the duel wweilding I simply say No nation has ever eqiopped their army with dual weilding and prospered, Then I get this "YOu idiot they were Elite" "China and japan used dual weapons" blah blah... I never said NO one does, But the most known conquering nations. Alexander the Great and his ELITE forces and the Romans, The persians, None of them Used dual weilding simply because a Spear, Shield, or Two handed weapon was much more efficent in war. Maybe if you go to some fancy sword ballerina place they will duel using that style but it isnt real war.
