objectivism instead of neoconservatism or objectivism instead of ultra-individualism?
ok, i'm not very familiar (that's the least i can say) with Ayn Rand works but for the little i may understand (sorry to say it but it is a really US thing... absolutly no offenses intented here! just meaning it is uneasy to understand for someone who has no US culture) originally objectivism has no proper political view, except for anticommunism (and i think more in a philosophical way than in a political way, well in a political way too, but to the extrem limit it is secondary)... true? well i may be badly wrong here...
neoconservatism as i've employed it may recover something more as a (more or less and more "less" than "more") unified political view...
hope the question is not just too stupid...
BTW Flash, you have a point here!!! but anyway i'm just trying to understand the exact implies of what i called bad propaganda because i don't think it is just Socialism Order that is in cause... and one more time the trouble is not wether i like his opinions or not (the answer is not, but it is really personnal and i don't ask to a writer or anyone else to share my political view!) but what they are...
well to be frank the only reason i continue to purchase his works has nothing to do with that... it is only because of the character of Cara the Mord Sith (Goodkind has still some humour when she handles things! well it is a bit repetitive and anyway too rare but...)
Last edited by MASTER_GUROTH; 31/08/04 11:38 AM.
