1st argument

P: i'm arguing

P->-P (read P is logically equivalent to Not P) -|antilogy

end of argument.

2nd argument

Boole or Bertrand lord Russel would have agreed with the first argument if they were not so hopelessly dead.

end of argument

counter argument: yea i know what is metalanguage, why?

another counter argument: Boole that's not really clear but Russel knew also what was metalanguage and he knew what was category's theory.... so, maybe he wouldn't have agreed with the first argument after all... <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/ouch.gif" alt="" />

i have an headache!

Last edited by MASTER_GUROTH; 08/10/04 01:16 PM.

MG!!! The most infamous member these forums have ever got!