mein deutsch ist sehr schlecht...entschuldigen mich bitte... Ich verstehe wie esperanto eine natüralische Sprache ist, als es ist ganz nicht eine formale Sprache...aber
wie kannt es eine Muttersparche sein?
i will be interested by an english translation of this entire thread and especially by Kunar post... as i'm sure i must have misunderstood some things...
well i must add i have only one problem with esperanto it is its pseudo universality... when this dream for a universal language has born state of linguistics researchs (very flourishing in the end of XIXth century particularly in England and Germany) was advanced in a way where non latin more largely non european languages should have been included in this dream...
The Esperanto's fathers have always refused that as their heirs...
so this universal is a very peculiar notion of universal...
anyway the concept of a universal natural language may be in itself a contradictory concept... as the only universal language for the moment we can know is formal (logical language)...
also, if it was a language that was so natural in the way of naturally used this time, why not posting in esperanto in this 'chat anything' section?
