IIRC the bug list was quite extensive... and i think that the reason most of these were not icluded in the readme, would be based on:
A lot of these bugs are not the type that most people would find during game play.... a lot of them were only found because the people did the most silly things to try and find them.
A lot were just too minor, and were only considered bugs because something didnt act according to specification (not nescesarily acting wrong).
To note some of them, you would have to include a spoiler in the readme (IMO thats a forbidden thing) as the bug only appears when you do a specific thing in a specific way/order.
Some bugs were never noted by players....so do you REALLY want to let them know that it ever existed????
Some bugs were the result of 1d10t errors (on the end user's side), and should never be included in a readme.... (its bad policy to let the end user know that he does / did something wrong)
Some quest bugs were just too many in certain areas, (and the reason of spoilers), so they were bundled into a catergory (e.g Act"*" Quest bugs fixed)
Some bugs were mere "facial pain" or "polish" and IMO not worth including in a readme.
