Well, what I meant is that imho many companies are tryoing to sell their things in the U.S. market ... simply because it's that big.
The result is that they are adopting for the market there ... otherwise they wouldn't sell.
On the other hand, the U.S. companies - as inc of the market itself - know of their value - they buy, so to say, and the others sell. Who has the power ? The seller or the buyer ? So they bring their weight to bear, so to say and imply that the rules they are used to are also used elsewhere - to the conditions of the on who has the power.
I'm still quit concerned about GATT - because it tries to impse rules into countries that are not made for these countries - especially negating the influence of culture. You cannot use rules that are made for one culture in another culture without adoption. It doesn't work.
But that's what - as it seems to me - is tried.
Alrik.
