First I confirm that I didn't find anything confirming what I announced above about a partial issue in the highest french catholic authorities' communicates... And so I apologize once more for relaying a bit too quickly misinformations.
Second: Flash, your argument is very strong for a general issue about remarried people. I think it is what is refererred to in the theologic text you quoted. But in the partial issue which is semmingly not existing it was not that, but it was limited to remarried people who had a a divorce pronounced in disfavor of the other member of their previous marriage, which is actually very restrictive. I think this is typically cases where a compromise between the views delivered by the two texts who aren't exactly contradictory but not in the same order (one is theologic, the other... moral? and yes i agree: for him the theologic aspect is probably much more important). That's whhy i thought a partial issue was plausible. Well all that is plausible is not true...