This could have been solved in the first Gulf war, but you americans didn't help the iraqis then why should we believe this about libirating them then?
don't believe it. it's bullsh*t. bush will remove saddam, and institute a dictator of his choosing, who will be in debt to america and will probably have an american politician pulling his strings, so that bush can make sure nothing stands in his way.
people wanna talk about how america isn't getting support from anyone? that's a load of BS. we now have over 40 countries on our side and recent polls indicate that roughly 80% of americans are supporting bush.
80%
of the people polled. you can make statistics say whatever you want them to say.
so what if countries like france don't support us? we have plenty of them that do. they didn't do jack to help liberate themselves when invaded, so it doesn't surprise me they don't want to help anyone else be liberated.
hmm. i just finished watching a show on the history channel about the french resistance against the nazis.
what i'm sick of is people yelling at protestors for not being around when saddam was gassing and murdering. well, you protest your own government when you disagree with what they are doing. american protesters against saddam would mean nothing.
Massmedia needs to sell... and some ppl working there are no better than other ppl. So they write/broadcast what other ppl wanna hear to become popular. In the USA there's a media war going on between a few networks about who can show news from Iraq more fast than the others. So I wouldn't trust to much of the "news" you get from those networks
thanks for agreeing with me, seth. thats exactly the point i was making about clear channel. that's why you should put more faith in non-profit media.
