I hear ya, kiya. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" />
But I rather see a new organisation handle war/peace problems.
A new organisation that only handles world peace and human rights for instance. Nothing more.
And that has enough ppl in the field to make sure things happen.
Not like now, when they just say "tsk tsk, you shouldn't do that, you bad person, you" and then stand by and watch/wait till the conflict is over. That's just why nobody listens. They have no authority and no respect left.
There are to many conflicts in the UN internally. It's about to many things: trade, human rights, economics, war/peace, environment,...
Conflicts are bound to happen. Members will vote against a war becouse they have the economic intrests in the back of their heads (under preasure from the politicians or the homefront). Or, and that's even worse, members will vote for a war becouse they have economic intrests in mind.
I rather see a group/organisation that doesn't have to answer to no one. But ofcourse, becouse of the members being human that's dangerous too. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/disagree.gif" alt="" />
All that happened in the last years just made things worse.
The world has never been so devided. And it gets more divided every day. Countries fall apart into smaller countries. The muslim and western worlds are drifting further apart. The USA and Europe are drifting apart.
Worldpeace will always be an illusion...
<img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/disagree.gif" alt="" /> <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/sad.gif" alt="" />
