Cut off his manly parts <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/winkwink.gif" alt="" />
he doesn't need those to cure cancer.
Btw, I know a lot of people recommend castration as an option for sex offenders. Well, here's an example where this could be detrimental(from another forum):
The problem is that castrating an adult male does not remove sexual drive at all. Instead, this drive can degenerate into something much worse. In 19th century there was a Russian sect called Skoptsy. They castrated themselves in order to be "pure". However, being unable to ger rid of their sexual urge, they turned into a band of extremely brutal sexual assaulters and sadists. Once again, desire for revenge above everything. Istead solving problem that would only create another. Castration would turn people who already have problems with controlling themselves into barrels of gunpowder, just waiting to explode.
Oh and the followers were both male and female too.
Well then cut off his manly parts and his arms too.
Since he isn't using his arms to write down notes, you have no use for his arms anyway.
And I always believed that castration took away the sexual urge, and sterilisation let you keep the urge but made you shoot blanks <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/winkwink.gif" alt="" />
I also thought that the problem with that kind of sexual offenders was not the sexual urge but more the feeling of power and being in control.
Our opinions differ and thats ok, but I know what I would cut off.
Well, sexual urge likely originates from your brain which controls your hormones and stuff. A sexual organ is merely there just for reproduction and to "introduce" sexual urge in another person(dating, mating, etc.).
Err.r.. just 'cos you cut off someone's arms and his manly parts won't stop him from influencing others. The only way is to gouge out his eyes, puncture his ears, remove his tongue, his arms/legs but... one warning: what if said person is able to know(sense) who's there? He could STILL devise methods to get around you... kinda annoying, huh? (heard of the old morse code?)
Well, it's been proven that such a process(cutting off the arms, eyes, etc.) will likely dehumanise the person who's committing the acts(Re: Stanford Prison Experiment) and also possibly introduce varying degrees of schizophrenia and psychosis. Furthermore, the longer you're around him, the more likely you'll start to mirror his behaviour. This is why in certain high-level prisons and psychiatry wards, the personnel are rotated so they don't start behaving like the prisoners/patients. And this is also why in the past, some prison wardens and even doctors, etc., would suddenly break and turn into another nutcase.
I suspect the best solution is to just throw him into an underground bunker which is electronically sealed and opened from the outside with the presence of at least 3 people, the bunker will be padded and there'll be many electronic scans, body checks, etc. to ensure he's disarmed and also constant electronic surveillance. That to me sounds less bloody than trying to use torture or any methods to ensure he won't do it again.
Besides, I'd want to put him under the microscope to find out why: if it helps save lives, why not? I want to study his brains and find out what makes him tick, why does he get pushed to do this? And besides, as long as he is NOT around children, things will be likely be quite fine.
