Well, Lynn, it's rather hard staying on-topic when there's nothing to say about it, right? So I'm afraid you'll have to give us a hint <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/tongue.gif" alt="" /> Don't worry, we're very easy on this one, just a "yes" or "no" would do.
Of course we could talk about Freud's theories concerning expansion packs, because it would probably have a bad character. You see, on the one hand the expansion would love it's mother, while on the other hand it would feel that the mother would get more attention and be more important. This would probably traumatize the young boy and would result in a suicidal ending of the game. I'm afraid the Itnernational Human Rights Campaign would stand up against that and protest on the streets of Eine. So, no expansion coming up according to Mr. Freud.
On the other hand, Freud might just be plain wrong. If we listen to Kant, we'd come to the conclusion that there's one in the pipeline. Because we can only experience what we are made to experience, the only new Larian game we could see should be based on the old one. Of course Kant's theories are subject to discussion, but I'm pretty sure he would agree that there will be an expansion soon.
Then we have Bertrand Russel. Infinity is not the same as infinity and yet it is the same. By logical deduction we come to the conclusion that Divinity might not be the same as Divinity. So it's pretty obvious we're getting a sequel instead of an expansion.
Einstein would just have one thing to say about this whole discussion: E = m*c˛. Translated this would result in:
Expansion = maybe * (speed of light)˛
So... no, Einstein would say that the chance we're getting an expansion is rather small.
With all respect to these scientists and philosophers... but I trust larian more on ths one <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/biggrin.gif" alt="" />
![[Linked Image]](http://www.members.aol.com/_ht_a/klastt/smile/smile.jpg)
*** Visit 
