Well, we're pretty nervous about that. I think we'd prefer no review on a bigger gaming site if the reviewer doesn't have the time to play through the full game, than a review from somebody who just looks at the game for a couple of hours, or from a reviewer who doesn't necessarily like RPGs just for the sake of having a review. Personally I think that's pretty unfair, but it happens more than is healthy.
Especially with the bigger ones, there's a risk that that happens, and we know from bitter experience that that can really ruin people's perceptions. DKS is a game for a certain target audience, and if it's reviewed outside of that target audience (like somebody comparing it to Halo 3), then it'll most likely be a bad review.
However, if it's reviewed within the context of its target audience, we can hope they'll be ok. At least, the initial signs are hopeful, but it's still early day.
Thats one of the things that both makes me laugh & cry about the gaming industry, I mean if your not a fan of a certain type of game then why the hell are you reviewing it. as far as I'm concerned the reviwers need either be a little more open minded or thay need to be a bit more orginised. If you can't be openminded & fair of judgement then there in the wrong profestion. the reviewers need to either organise themselfs so they specilise i reviewing certain game types or thay need to be a bit more picky about the people thay hire to review the games.
That's the reson I never listen to reviews because 90% of the time thay talk through their butts & don't even know themselfs what the hell their even playing.
