I'm sorry, but you speak pure bullcrap, mate.
Name like this puts off both adults and children alike. If a game is named THIS bad, you won't touch it unless you at least heard a good thing about it.
Divine Divinity, the one with horrible title, HAD blood. After killing enemies, blood splatters appeared in most of the cases.
Sexual content? You could go to Verdistis to the bar, and even do gay sex there. Much more possibilities than in Divinity 2.
Divine One was less forced to be good than The Dragon Knight, you could randomly attack most of citizens (except ones too important for the story), do things bad way too...
Besides, you contradict yourself yet again - now you complain about losing children audience, and before you said about how majority of players are adults.
Im not contradicting, I said it might put some people off, some people wont play video games often, the grab a title or two every 2 or 3 years and try it out.
the post you talk about was about the fact that children are not a large demographic group in divinity sales. while in the last one im just stating how children are easily influenced. how can these two contradict each other ?
and what do you mean by "again" ? when did i contradict myself ? if you mean "that" post, the reason was that i sounded a bit like a douch, so i took back what i said just to prevent being what i hate the most, but in essence i did not lie. i believe i did give you the sources for it.
but enough of that, tell me, would the game be better if it had the same amount of content richness as divine divinity ? i mean with the blood and the sex and the . . . etc . . . ?
