I have considered that there will be other armors in the game. I’m perfectly content and happy with other armors in the game if I have a choice, some being practical, impractical, and even revealing. What one does inside the game, if they want that to get their rocks off, that’s fine by me.

My concern is for the portrayal of the main cover art. The main cover art explicitly tells me is how the game is going to treat their characters inside the game. At least, more often than not it does. I’ve been proven wrong on a rare case, but usually, if a partially revealed woman is on the cover, it usually means that women will be treated how they usually are in video games, as side characters serving the main male character, as damsels, or just as a piece of ass for a man to play behind so he doesn’t have to look at a male’s ass, etc.

The cover art tells me who this game is for. For instance, Bioshock Infinite, very well could have had Elizabeth on the cover, since she is a huge part of the story, standing alongside the male protagonist, but it doesn’t because the common perception is that men won’t play a game with a main female character and women aren’t going to pick up the game anyway.

If the cover is respectable to women, then they know that they too are invited to come play and that they will not feel demeaned or belittled inside. That’s not always the case either, but it’s a better way to advertise that you don’t hate women by putting positive figures on the cover.