We, as in you and me got started on your claims on the majority. As for the claims of censorship I actually agreed at first that them changing it wasn't by itself a sign of censorship, you choose to ignore that part of my statement. You also choose to ignore the point I made that you clearly have an agenda in lessening the preceived sexualization, and so would like the change regardless of why he did it.

And as I posted Swen Vincke has made comments about sexism in his own game, so I have provided at least some circumstantial evidence that it might of been an attempt at self-censorship.

http://www.lar.net/2013/02/28/self-censorship/#more-713


Last edited by IronClaw; 20/04/13 03:37 PM.