It differs based on the perceived reasons, be they real or otherwise, that led to the conclusion that the change was an act of censorship.

Me, I dislike the human form, I only like the internal complexity and am particularly fascinated by the brain, so I don't mind the change.

I do prefer decency over any other invokable factors around this discussion, and do find a gray area between decency and freedom of expression.

But it's probably just me having formed my principles my own way.

Unless otherwise specified, just an opinion or simple curiosity.