Originally Posted by henryv
Originally Posted by Ragnin
Originally Posted by Regnox
true ^^ well if he thinks the game deserves a 6 fine. I just find the way he wrote it kind of bad (it's his first so he has a good excuse)...


I agree with the how bad that review sounded and made the game sound. I was somewhat shocked to see the 6/10. The reviewer made it sound like a 3 or 4/10 game. He did not put anything in the review to make you think he had any fun playing it. I also found the comparing it to AAA titles in bad taste since is not a AAA game.


I think he was expecting a lot, and when I mean a lot, I mean "revival of the golden era of RTS". One thing that bothers me in the review was the "Story". I believe review codes can only give you one chapter, but from his review, it looks like he completed the story? Either he's lying or he didn't give the game a chance.

From the tone of his introductory message, you could say he is very enthusiastic about the game, but it only ended up making his expectations short.


Review codes get the full game, preview codes only had the first chapter. I agree though. Of course it isn't going to be a revival of the golden age of RTS as it's a multi-genre title. I don't think he did a bad review I just think he went in with the wrong expectations. It seems (don't want to say 100% till I get the full game) like a wonderful multi-genre release, although that kind of release calls for a bit of a sacrifice to each of the genres. Could the RTS be better? yes, but taken as a whole the game seems better than a more competent RTS that doesn't have the other modes.