So you're response that they weren't deceptive is some post on some outside site rather than the their stickied posts here?
That was a single example, and as you keep pointing out, posts here can be changed, so isn't a link to another site that can not be edited after the fact more reliable?
I was refuting the proposition that Larian lied, which means it does not matter where the quote is from. If you were arguing that Larian was unclear (which you wouldn't need to, because that isn't in dispute), then having info on the kickstarter or other sites but on the offical site would matter.
Lies that they changed after the fact that were posted to their own site.
Do you really believe that they deliberately lied on their own site, and yet told the truth on other sites, all throughout the kickstarter campaign, etc? Because somehow there was no overlap between people following the forum and kickstarter and they were not tweeting about the Reddit AMA, etc? Don't you think if they were deliberately trying to hide the lack of a lobby, they could have been consistent?
also this has nothing to do with a lobby/browser/etc. the guy (from the subforum of some unknown q&a meeting) just asked if they could play together.
And was very specifically told that they could not use Steamworks but could use
direct IP, as in not a lobby. As in it is, in fact, relevant to the discussion.
should tell you that there is something wrong with your viewpoint.
It tells me Larian was unclear on the situation. In part that was because for some time they had not determined exactly how they would be handling multiplayer for the DRM free versions.
its nice and all that you write some marketing slurs here and there
I have not written any slurs or done any marketing. I refuted accusations that Larian deliberately tried to deceive people.
It is interesting that I can state a position and back it up with logic and facts and you call it a slur, but it is apparently fine if people want to call Larian liars and worse.
