I would like to not have to quote myself, but let me rephrase myself:
This is a fairly heated argument over a work of fiction that is not a piece of propaganda. In other words, an argument over nothing consistent.
We're talking about an emulation of parts of reality, very similar, but fundamentally different. If you feel offended, hurt, affected by the things put in the game and the way the fictional viewpoints are handled, that is your problem. It's you that needs to take a step back and draw the lines between reality and fiction, particularly between the weight of issues part of reality and "issues" with (should have) no weight whatsoever on reality.
Now would the conspiracy theorists please pick up a new hobby?
To be fair, I await to be proven wrong. With good arguments.
