So, you are denying that you wrote
"But when the original 'no differences' post was made (which was a response to questions of version compatibility, not the actual implementation) details of the DRM free multiplayer had not been finalized."
now?
Everybody can look at the date of your mentioned post and it's 5 weeks before release. That's a timespan in which you just don't don't know how the multiplayer is set up (especially if it's steamworks). I figure the application for steamworks alone take a week. That means you well made up your mind if you want to do a masterbrowser for all or just the steamworks folks WELL BEFORE THAT TIME, because if you use the second, it's not feasable to implement a second one just for the drm free version. Yeah, I know economics too, the world revolves around it.
I kinda chuckle about how you wanna "discuss away" with "facts" that customers felt deceived. Yeah, in this post I do the same, but it's just to defend against the new stuff you bring up, instead of settling the original problem. Which would mean Larian growing some balls and apologizing about the unclear description and fixing that here and now (product description on vault) and promise to do better in the future. It's NOT OK to have to read on some other source (you keep bringing up "larian said...") what features the game has, because you obviously nowadays can't trust the description beneath the damn [BUY] button. A problem which not only your company has, mind you. Gotta search high and low on the internet nowadays if a game requires steam. I wonder why? Can it be that that's a NEGATIVE bulletin point on the product description
