Everyone is arguing with everyone based on opinions alone lol.. such arguments can't ever be truly won.
Opinions can be invalid though (improperly reasoned and rooted in fallacy), so not all are equal in that respect.
Read this whole thread, what is it talking about? What were the objections here and were they founded in properly reasoned logic, or were they unsupported accusations of fallacious means?
The main point of this discussion was how to make "hard" mode more difficult based on the evaluation Hiver gave as to why the game was too easy.
The "opinons" here should be about what people think would work and would not concerning those systems, but instead it has devolved into petty emotional contests and objections.
