Nonsense. You can just as easily invest a little into either magic, scoundrel or expert marksman to broaden the available tools for a warrior.
And spellcasters can do the same to cherrypick the lowhanging MoA/Marksman/Scoundrel fruit as well. The point is, by focusing on INT you get access to a lot more skills than you do by focusing STR or DEX.
Originally Posted by Sykar
Plenty of games in which mages weren't great and warriors were top.
And this isn't one of them. What's wrong with expecting some semblance of class balance?
It must be wonderful to have 200 skill points to get all these 50+ spells and scoundrel and MoA and Marksman....
Originally Posted by Icezera
And if spellcasters think they can really access all 5 schools of magic, you're high.
You're not going to have enough points and you'll be bleeding ap left and right because your skill level is not high enough. Stop theorizing and actually address the game. The mage might have access to 50+ abilities but he will never use them all because they severely gimp his effectiveness.
There is nothing wrong with two handed melee or sword and shield melee. You don't even understand how to play the game.
Two handed melee are great damage dealers while sword and shield melee can rush to the enemy backline and survive on their own without any need for support from your other characters.
I doubt at this point many have really played a Sword and Board warrior like this since my experience is that ranged enemies mostly focus those who are closest to them which is actually logical since those pose the highest threat to them. Most seem to think they just crash into the front lines and the AI is stupid enough to just focus them while the rest of your team sits back and trashes them.
