I merely asked a question and stated my opinion on the matter. The budget is a good point but I did say they've done a great job for being a smaller company. Im still unsure of how people have come up with a percentage of players with problems to those without.
People get really defensive about a game they have invested both money and time into and it's beginning to feel like it's that tribal type of attitude that caused such a reaction to my article. I'm not bad mouthing the game. I only wanted to encourage a lite debate.
So you love the game, you have hundreds of good stuff that could share with people (because everyone who loves a game has them) and you just wanted to say the game failed to launch, because...?
I appreciate a good debate, and i think i've given you a reasonably explanation on my opinion up a few posts (hopefuly you read it?), but i still think you are wrong in your assumption it was a bad launch. Surely was not perfect because perfection is zero bugs and issues but especialy in PC gamming that is impossible due to the millions of diferent hardware/software configurations.
In my personal opinion, you just wanted to be a naysayer. If i'm being tribal and defensive about a game i like, i'm not sure, i think i'm just trying to defend the internet of naysayers
Anyways, hopefuly you won't be offended by my post, it's not meant to be tribal nor flammable.
