Relax, mate, I only wanted to say that there is a lot of space for improvement and optimization. You're certainly right about the capacities of Ubisoft or other big companies of course. But you should always compete with the best or the biggest...
Hey, chill out man.
Divinity 2 had its issues on launch (including graphics performance) which gradually got patched up and it now runs very nicely (though the gameplay could be better....) so Larian do have a track record of fixing things. But with a game as complex as D:OS, I think some here could cut them more slack when it comes to non-gamebreaking issues.
Your computer specs are extremely low end. It would be a stretch to even consider them mid-low end....You definitely need to upgrade your system specs. If you don't like AMD, then check out the intel i5-4670k. It runs for around $219.99 and it is an ~50% increase in performance over your current CPU...I also have to say that 8gb of RAM is quite low these days... I also have to assume that your RAM is not very fast, but I could be wrong.
tl:dr This is not a problem with the game. Your CPU/Computer Specs are out-dated for current gen. Could the game use some more optimization? Probably. Yet still, your computer's specs are out-dated.
Whoa there - his system is *not* low end and *doesn't* need upgrading. In particular, suggesting an increase on 8GB RAM when the game itself can't use more than 4GB (and on my system, uses just 1.6GB) is just bad advice which would waste money.
The fact is this game, like any new release,
will see performance improvements (going from 1.0.36 to 1.0.47 has already offered significant boosts for many) and best advice is to hold on and see if future builds fix issues.
Next best advice would be to find out where the bottleneck is (using software like Process Hacker, MSI Afterburner and Process Monitor) and only replace the relevant item, rather than wasting money on shotgun upgrades.
There are of course, those who can't stand being more than a couple of months behind the bleeding edge hardware-wise - they're the ones who spend all their time running benchmarks. Your advice might be more relevant to them, but they'd likely be too busy with 3DMark to bother with D:OS.
