Correction, it would be a violation of the TOU/EULA.
EULA/TOU doesn't equate to law. It's the creators attempt to cover their backsides. As such, and given they're written predominantly by lawyers, they will basically cover themselves in any which way they can conceive of. It may seem restrictive, but that's just to ensure someone doesn't attempt to find a loophole they can wriggle through. Whether it's enforceable would depend upon the courts determination of it's legality.
Violating the EULA is legal only if EULA itself violates the law. For example some consumer protection laws and etc. While this can happen (and happens quite a bit), it's not necessarily the case here. I'd say without a sound legal basis, one can't make a claim that one can ignore this EULA because it might violate the law.
