And then you act surprised and almost outraged when I point how unpleasant can be to interact with you. And please, let me point that being so verbose and long-winded in making vacuous remarks doesn't make them more grounded in reality.
I.E. "Oh oh oh, see? Verbiage is the key, sarcastic depreciation, blah blah blah". Dude, I just pointed I don't care what they wanted to do, I care about the fact I don't think it worked. And I spent several posts arguing more in detail WHY I think this system "trivializes itemization". Just because you failed to acknowledge them it doesn't mean I must be committed to work full time to offer you a recap at every single reply.
You also didn't make "very detailed arguments" in favour of this system as you are claiming. You ranted, in your usual long-winded way, of tangent arguments like different games and emerging gameplay that hardly relate to the loot system.
You didn't really use your free credit hour. To have available such a detailed, exhaustive breakdown of your writing and completely ignore every point suggests an underlying pathology. I'm sorry for your cognitive state at this juncture. Enjoy your life of rigid linear thinking and self-assured cognitive dissonance. It makes me very sad knowing you have no way to help yourself right now. Good luck.
