Larian Banner: Baldur's Gate Patch 9
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
RtM #534886 02/08/14 07:06 AM
Joined: Feb 2014
Location: California
R
RtM Offline OP
member
OP Offline
member
R
Joined: Feb 2014
Location: California
Theyre back! rpg005

RtM #534935 02/08/14 08:41 AM
Joined: May 2010
Location: Oxford
Duchess of Gorgombert
Offline
Duchess of Gorgombert
Joined: May 2010
Location: Oxford
They are indeed. D:

So I'm having another deleting spree until Raze bans them again...


J'aime le fromage.
RtM #534936 02/08/14 08:43 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: Canada
Support
Offline
Support
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: Canada

Banned the most recent one (and one recent account with all their posts deleted), and another shortly after RtM's post...

RtM #534937 02/08/14 08:46 AM
Joined: May 2010
Location: Oxford
Duchess of Gorgombert
Offline
Duchess of Gorgombert
Joined: May 2010
Location: Oxford
I'm glad you're so quick off the mark! This particular spammer does seem to be weirdly determined...


J'aime le fromage.
RtM #535133 02/08/14 11:29 AM
Joined: Jul 2014
Location: Denmark
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2014
Location: Denmark
I think I deleted several hundreds of spam posts the last hour or so. It seems like the flow has stopped (for now).

RtM #535135 02/08/14 11:41 AM
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: Canada
Support
Offline
Support
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: Canada

You didn't leave me very many... oh well; time to sort the user list and delete the new accounts with a bunch of deleted posts (sorry, I only just missed the start of the one with 116 posts in the last 45 minutes).

RtM #535397 02/08/14 04:35 PM
Joined: Apr 2013
Location: Germany
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Apr 2013
Location: Germany
Funny to watch spam pop up and then disappear again. ^^

RtM #535433 02/08/14 04:40 PM
Joined: May 2010
Location: Oxford
Duchess of Gorgombert
Offline
Duchess of Gorgombert
Joined: May 2010
Location: Oxford
Though it's a bit arse that they sometimes appear as fast as we delete them. I guess it's an automated spambot, either that or someone who's drunk way too much coffee.


J'aime le fromage.
RtM #535441 02/08/14 04:40 PM
Joined: Jul 2014
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2014
Oh it's definitely a spambot.

RtM #535458 02/08/14 04:44 PM
Joined: Apr 2013
Location: Germany
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Apr 2013
Location: Germany
Well, at least I now know who to call if I need black magic help in India. horsey

RtM #535495 02/08/14 05:06 PM
Joined: Feb 2014
Location: California
R
RtM Offline OP
member
OP Offline
member
R
Joined: Feb 2014
Location: California
You guys are doing a great job....but really, you should HAVE TO do this so often. Not going to be fixed until you require a bit more to become a member. Having a security measure for each post would be too much now that I think of it. So just in creating a profile.

RtM #535507 02/08/14 05:16 PM
Joined: Dec 2012
Moderator Emeritus
Offline
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: Dec 2012
What about a security pattern recognition (something like letters and numbers) test whenever you want to create a new thread?

Elwyn #535512 02/08/14 05:23 PM
Joined: May 2013
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: May 2013
I wouldn't go further than on-account creation security and number of threads within a short-ish time frame. We want to stop the spambots not annoy the legitimate users.


Unless otherwise specified, just an opinion or simple curiosity.
Elwyn #535519 02/08/14 05:34 PM
Joined: Apr 2013
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Apr 2013
Originally Posted by Elwyn
What about a security pattern recognition (something like letters and numbers) test whenever you want to create a new thread?


I've seen that on other forums, and it is really annoying. Even if they limit it to the first 5-10 posts you make, it's still really annoying. Especially when the CAPTCHAs are hard (or sometimes impossible) to read. I agree with EinTroll, no need to annoy legitimate posters. There are better methods of spambot control.

RtM #535520 02/08/14 05:34 PM
Joined: Apr 2013
Location: Germany
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Apr 2013
Location: Germany
A captcha to create an account is ok, but having to constantly do that every time you want to create a thread is not a good idea.

Anyway, it might help to just block the IP addresses of public proxys, spambots like to use these to spread their crap. But I dunno, let Larian decide what is best and most effective.

Last edited by dlux; 02/08/14 05:36 PM.
dlux #535521 02/08/14 05:39 PM
Joined: May 2010
Location: Oxford
Duchess of Gorgombert
Offline
Duchess of Gorgombert
Joined: May 2010
Location: Oxford
Originally Posted by dlux
A captcha to create an account is ok, but having to constantly do that every time you want to create a thread is not a good idea.

Anyway, it might help to just block the IP addresses of public proxys, spambots like to use these to spread their crap. But I dunno, let Larian decide what is best and most effective.

Yeah, I'd certainly go along with that. The Larian chaps are back soon, I understand, so hopefully they'll give the matter some consideration.


J'aime le fromage.
RtM #535616 02/08/14 08:27 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: Canada
Support
Offline
Support
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: Canada

I'm hoping for posting frequency limits for new users (until a reasonable number of time and posts have past), as well as URLs not being resolved into links (so people would still be able to copy and paste to see a screenshot, etc, but spammers would get no benefit trying to game Google's ranking algorithm).

dlux #535660 02/08/14 10:16 PM
Joined: Nov 2003
member
Offline
member
Joined: Nov 2003
Originally Posted by dlux
Anyway, it might help to just block the IP addresses of public proxys...
Which would also block legitimate posters who want/need to use such proxies (Tor being a very good example as one of very few methods effective against state surveillance).

Giving moderators the power to ban accounts (which they should have by default in UBB) would seem sensible.

RtM #535665 02/08/14 10:27 PM
Joined: Jul 2014
enthusiast
Offline
enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2014
I can kind of understand why Raze might hand out the "delete threads" privilege a little more easily than the "ban accounts" privilege. Or perhaps it's not something he can transfer. In any case, would be nice.

Stargazer #535701 02/08/14 11:56 PM
Joined: Apr 2013
Location: Germany
addict
Offline
addict
Joined: Apr 2013
Location: Germany
Originally Posted by Stargazer
Originally Posted by dlux
Anyway, it might help to just block the IP addresses of public proxys...
Which would also block legitimate posters who want/need to use such proxies (Tor being a very good example as one of very few methods effective against state surveillance).

Giving moderators the power to ban accounts (which they should have by default in UBB) would seem sensible.

I can understand that, but why would someone need TOR to visit Larian.com? Not like anything illegal or even remotely similar is going on here. ^^

Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5