Reloading after getting a bad result due to an RPS game is not *expected behavior*. For example, in Age of Decadence (an Early Access game) you could use several skills in dialogue (even stats sometimes) for alternative, optimal, sub-optimal, bad(mostly on failure, sometimes even at success...intimidating successfully does not mean people won't get back at you at first opportunity) outcomes which makes you feel rewarded if you built your character in a certain way. If you fail well you can keep going from a different path or things can get heated and people might die. Literally you can use tons of skill checks and stat checks at branching dialogues. There you can say "Man I tried everything at my disposal well better to move on".

Here, it is only RPS...well you can supposedly increase your chances with some investment but...it is still RPS. Definitely there could be a better way to deal persuasion which will consider your skills, the NPCs skills/standing in the world and at the same time entertain the player.

In essence RPS might be fun with a friend like 4-5 rounds...but that is all. With NPCs at the lack of an intelligent persuasion minigame, I'd rather prefer classical checks and stuff.