The classical comment would be, "I don't understand, how can nudity bother you while violence doesn't?"
I kinda stopped trying to understand a while ago. Violence is an act of hatred or fear while nudity is.. well, natural. We are all naked individual wearing clothes. The cynical could tell that violence is also a very natural human trait, but I guess you got my point. It's all a question of education, I guess. After all, there are people teaching their child how to hold a gun but not telling them how babies are conceived. *shrug*
That's the one that always gets me confused too: that violence, sometimes even quite serious, can be considered inoffensive and acceptable, but that even fairly mild language and nudity are. I guess I could write it off as a cultural thing, but that still doesn't feel especially enlightening as I'd be left wondering how that came to pass (assuming it's the case).
On the other hand, nudity also kinda prevented me from playing the Witcher games, especially the first. Well there wasn't really nudity in TW1, but they sold their game claiming it was a "dark and mature game", and for some reasons, people tend to think that 'mature' means including sex/nudity. The amount of girls Geralt could frak ( and, worse, keep trophies out of those encounters ) was stupid. So you see, it's not nudity itself that bothered me, rather the gratuitous use that was made of it...
I can see that the rather gratuitous application of it could bother people, or at least feel out of place. My TW1 Geralt was almost a saint in that regard so I didn't really see it so much; in which case I'm not sure how much I'd say it might be considered a reasonable reaction to player choice!
I dunno, I don't generally like excessive
anything in my entertainment, but otherwise I don't really mind overly much what's included. Though I admit the juvenile part of me (even at 47, probably the greater part) was entertained by Thaler's habitual and casually foul language in The Witcher 3.
