It's clear at this point you are just an ideologue, since you ignore everything except the comparative psychology part which you disagree with based on some armchair musings about its applicability. There were statements there by Dr. Gaad, but you thought the studies in monkeys was the weakest so you focused on that and ignored everything else.
Studies in infancy on the matter are done precisely to negate or lessen effects of socialization to study this. Since this produces a result that is uncomfortable to your ideological eye, you have to deny it and claim it doesn't apply to adults, where you would then happily prescribe it all to socialization. It's not really a valid argument anyway, since showing that it happens before socialization is enough to demonstrate that male and females inherently have differing tendencies. One may as well dishonestly claim, if such studies did not show preference presocialization, that the innate portions of human psychology only kick after childhood or in adulthood as a cop out, but science does not work that way.
It's funny how people will cheer on evolution and laugh about how many Americans disbelieve in it, but suddenly evolution doesn't apply to humans when it's politically expedient. When we draw evolutionary generalizations on other species, it's fine to compare and draw inferences on related species, but when it comes to humans and anything else, that's unacceptable. But who knows, maybe evolution is just a lie.
Also, don't twist my words. Brain lateralization effects are exaggerated, but that doesn't discount the actual truth that there are important differences between the male and female brain.
It's pretty clear that, considering your flopping around on this and your admission to intentionally mischaracterizing what people said, that what you believe in is not facts of truth of facts of ideology. There's nothing further to discuss here because in your view, the universe only allows for human males and females to have complete cognitive parity where all differences are due to socialization. Sexual dimorphism in humans is a politically inconvenient truth for some.
For emphasis for others, I'm going to put these two statements here together and let people conclude what they may:
You are seriously accusing me of intellectual dishonesty when this thread is full of false analogies and strawmen?
Yes, I was wrong in saying anything about people insinuating that men and women "should" play different games, my emotions got the best of me and I shouldn't have allowed that.
