I've explained multiple times the objective qualities of art, but nobody listens or is interested. You can't build art on opinions, trust me.
Oh, I think we actually listen AND are interested ( maybe I'm only speaking for myself but yet ). It's just that we ( ok let's say I so I don't speak for everyone else ) - it's just that I don't agree at all on the topic of art as a subjectif vs objective concept. We already talked earlier in this topic so I won't just repeat myself =)
Essentially, whenever one doesn't agree with someone else, both of their claims become "opinions". In the Grand Order of things, one of those is probably closer to the Truth than the other. Yet we can't, us poor human, mortal beings, know which one.
We often default the "objective" to "the opinion that is the most widely supported", but still it's only an opinion. Science has it easier : it's theory and empirical observations vs proven facts. We don't discuss the Earth revolving around the Sun, because it's now a fact. But we could discuss Marcel Duchamp's "Fountain" as art because it is not a fact but rather a gathering of same-minded opininons, born from a lot of personal experiences, knowledges, and overall feelings. ( hint : let's not discuss "Fountain". As one of the most controversial art piece of the 20th I felt if was the best example is all :p )
I think you're educated enough to know that whenever you make a claim based on your personnal experience, skill, and knowledge, it automatically IS an opinion, and is automatically labelled as such. The only thing we can't deny are mathematic, so they can't be considered an opinion.
And hell is it sad. I don't believe that... things... like FF7 : Crysis Core should be considered a great game and praised everywhere. That thing was utter garbage and I have a hard time accepting the fact that it is only my opinion and not the truth =(
