None of this is any different to what mages can do or could be made to do.
And thats the point, but you have it the wrong way.
WHY would we make this into something a mage does when you might aswell have a martial do it?
Even tho i dont agree with you because no a mage would not grapple or throw enemies.
So far there are 3 trees that arent mage based. Only ONE of them is a fighter tree.
one is the rogue tree and one is the archer tree.
Then you got 5 mage trees.
WHY would we need more mages?
All these trees are based on the same stat. Why would we want more mages when Martials could do all these things?
