You really have no idea do you?
You reject the premise that after armour is reduced to 0 that CC has a 100% chance to land? Is that what you reject?
Because that is the only thing I have ever been talking about. There is no 2 arguments here. It is your own complete lack of comprehension that is leading you to believe otherwise.
Given: 'when armor reaches 0, CC is 100%'
Qiox's conclusion #1: 'therefore, it is too easy to CC someone'
Qiox's conclusion #2: 'therefore, there is no need for adaptation'
To prove the first conclusion, you need to at least identify the resources at play and define 'easy'.
To prove the second conclusion, you need to define an objective (in your case, it's player victory) and then prove how the "given" directly leads to the objective.
Now, I would take a gander at your other comments, but I am afraid they would detract away from the main conversation point.
I am also strongly hinting (actually, telling you right off the bat) that you're confusing
execution context with the
function.
