@aj0413 The topic of the thread is - CC is currently flawed, I've suggestions to make it more manageable.
Hello, I said. I've suggestions to make it more manageable too. Let's take the magical/physical armour idea they currently use to make it more manageable and evolve it.
How in god's name do you think that doesn't contribute to the debate? Is it your reasoning that because the OP didn't write the word 'armour' in his first post, we can't write 'armour' either?
I can keep revealing your contradictions all day, if needs-be. You're not exactly the savviest of writers (pro tip: the wacky dialogues with yourself don't help), and it's like shooting fish in a barrel to be honest - but do try me for another one
*shrug* I do it to amuse myself so it hardly matters doesn't it?
Also this is the thread title: "Re: Replace crowd control with more interesting effect"
That doesn't have the word manageable in it last I checked.
Manageable was mentioned as a side point to the first. So one directly comes from the other. From there logic dictates that whatever form of "manageable" your operating on to contribute must add to the discussion of CC "effects" and making them "more interesting".
But please tell me how I contradict myself and do try to explain how the armor system add to the discussion of making CC effects more interesting and manageable directly cause of the effects they cause; not how said effects are manageable prevented.
There's a difference in managing something by stopping it
And managing something inspite of it
Notice your focus on the former
Edit:
*looking both ways* huh, seems smokey has decided to bow out of this debate.
