@aj0413 Lulz. Lots of them. Don't know what 'zone' you're in, but I gotta sign off for the night pretty soon. It's nearly 1am and I've work etc.
You're not trying to counter my argument with words, you're trying to counter my argument with technical nit-pickery. And even there you're tripping over yourself.
Now we're wheeling out the fact that 'armour' isn't in the title???
Man, are you kidding me? That's desperate stuff. How many posts on these forums actually even stay on point with the title of the thread? The point of an intelligent discussion is to assess what someone has said/written and build on it. In very general terms, the OP wants to tackle the issue of CC.
In very general terms, I want to tackle it too - and I've forwarded the idea of evolving the armour system to achieve that. It's like you're saying, 'I can't come up with counter logic to what he's saying, so I'm going to try and pull the red card because he hasn't talked about REPLACING CC WITH A MORE INTERESTING EFFECT EXACTLY TO THE POINT. Even though, if you were to be particularly anal about it, I could say that's exactly what I'm doing - replace current CC with an elemental-armour based system that only allows elemental CC when elemental armour is destroyed - hence more interesting.
Last edited by smokey; 16/10/16 11:53 PM.