I'm definitely off to bed, and probably off for good from these forums. You've put a lot of effort into your post, I'll give you that. But your words are the equivalent of a dog chasing its own tail, around and around and around...
Simple Simon version:
OP: don't like CC, make interesting
ME: don't like CC, make armour make it interesting
YOU: OP not say armour in post, OP say make CC interesting
ME: I say armour make CC interesting
YOU: OP not say armour in title, you make tangent say armour
ME: OP not need say armour, I say armour to make CC interesting
YOU: I say OP say, you say what you say, OP say what he say, you say what you say, I say what I say, OP say...
And then I say - goodnight, children of the forums. And may the world treat you kindly, for you are young and innocent and have much to see and do and learn.
You ... *sigh* whatever, goodnight for what that's worth.
If you missed the point of everything entirely. But here let me make it as simple as possible
You: make armor interesting, make "causing" CC interesting
Me: this is fine, but I'd like CC "effects" to be interesting in itself....which is the thread focus
These aren't mutually exclusive but switching focus from one to the other (one that's discussed to death everywhere) negates the chance for contrastive discussion of the former
