Your entire inane, repetitive rant continuously boils down to the point you've summed up in this sentence:
'was the armor system discussion on point to the original focus of the thread?'
You're obsessed!
Does the armour system have to be mentioned by the OP for me to bring it into the conversation to improve CC? If so, where does it say that in the 'rules'? If not, how in your opinion is it problematic to constructive opinion about the game?
I've given ideas for improving a game mechanic.
All you've done is whinge about the fact that armour wasn't mentioned by the OP.
The only reason I brought in the other thread was because in your little square box of a world, the nasty man whose ideas I can't challenge didn't say [insert irrelevant word here] that was in the OP. Therefore the nasty man is wrong.
Reading the innumerable posts of the others on the 'Game was great then this happen...' thread, the majority of them certainty did not interpret CC as the problem the OP mentioned. Are you going to disqualify all of them too?
Know when you've lost an argument, mate. I've made my contribution to the making the game better. All you're doing is snapping at my heels.
Why would I be arguing against your idea? I think the idea is fine.
Why would I be referring to rules? There are none.
How am I obsessed when i simply find the idea that you think you can win this argument you won't let drop amusing? Hint: just go to bed. You don't have to argue it. For me this is just entertainment
Why would I disqualify all the other discussions in that thread? They all more or less had something to do with the original post. Your the one trying to prove my own discussion there wasn't on point. There were several threads within that one branching off but staying related. I can pull up all the posts on CC that aren't mine to make a point I wasn't the only one if ya want; even ones by the original poster.
You have given constructive feedback. I grant you that freely. And it wasn't necessarily bad at that. I jut find it sad that the original focus of the thread was offering a unique view on how to improve the game without rehashing old territory. I attempted to move back to that.
You were the one who had to make a point that I was remiss in trying to move things back to the focus. I decided to take you up on that challenge
Now you want to say "cause it's not mentioned in the OP?" Have you heard of inference? It's a thing. Something doesn't have to be explicitly stated to be understood or related. All I've made a point of showing is that whatever version of inference you were working on was definitely in error
There's a whole wide forum of many threads; many of them handily inviting discussion of the armor system. Why you feel the need to argue the validity of:
"All threads are about construive game feedback, therefore I can give any kind of constructive feedback in all threads."
Is lost on me.
You keep moving the goal post if the argument. Whether the argument matters or not isnt really the issue. hint hint: it doesn't matter.
Edit:
Correction: the existence of your idea is fine
