And official people come in and talk about free speach
Correct.
and how they can't figure out who to ban
No, you completely missed the point. That was a rhetorical question about the implications of moderating on content. Banning the 'other' side based on arbitrary rules can easily be turned against 'your' side. Also, it would defeat the purpose of having an open forum, particularly one specifically for feedback.
well how about one that started offending first? rocket science huh?
So, you then? Depending on whether I side more with the second response than you?
Or are you faultless and your tone above reproach because you are 'right', and nobody could possibly have any justification for being offended at anything you say?
instead of cleaning trolls just closes the topic.
Do you honestly believe there could have been any constructive discussion in that topic, if not for 'trolls'? All you said was that was bad, you weren't going to explain why and it was worse than a real war. Other than 'troll' comments about the comparison to war, you just dismissed replies about realism and game mechanics, so what exactly was left to discuss?
There could be a discussion on this subject, but that particular topic didn't really get off on the right foot, and probably wasn't going to suddenly turn constructive.
