You call what I said a personal attack? Hardly.
A personal attack isn't based on intention or any amount of implied hostility, it's based on specifically bringing up the person in your response and then insulting them rather than what they wrote.
These are all personal attacks:
Also, you are being incredibly insulting by implying that vometia doesn't care about story because she likes a silly ladder animation.
How can you and vometia come to an agreement between "The ladder animations completely ruin the tone of the entire game and must be removed" and "I like the ladder animations, they are fun"?
Thanks for proving my point. Look at the ego on you. If someone wants durability gone, than they are dumb and need someone smart to explain to them why They Are Wrong.
Because only you understand game design? Because only people who are masters of game design should be allowed to give feedback?
You call what I said a personal attack? Hardly.
If you can't understand or accept the idea of different tones having a place, well I don't think you understand balance in writing that much.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Of course you're giving opinions! The choices about what things you decide should be brought up are a reflection of the opinions. There is nothing arbitrary or objective in that.
I'm saying that it's futile to try to get everyone to try to agree, especially the smaller the details which you're trying to find common agreement on.
More is not needed just because the pig-mages not being insane is one thing when you randomly and arbitrarily decide realism must be adhered to.
So only YOU have the Right Answers and anyone who says otherwise obviously doesn't understand what they're talking about?
This is awful. Never use examples for things that don't exist to prove your point. Wow, so people can never agree in our history, so that means we should never agree? Awesome point. All games right now are made for entertainment? Man, games as a medium must be specifically for entertainment. Awesome. Let's never change.
What you are doing is arguing, personally attacking me instead of thinking about what I wrote. I don't understand exactly how you could read all of that and then attack me, but perception is weird, so who knows.
Not to say you are personally attacking me more than I am attacking you, or that maybe you care more about proving me wrong than proving that my words are wrong, that would just be... oh my god, is this becoming a personal attack?
