I think I mentioned the most important parts in my opening post.
DD and BD are probably the best in the sense of story-progression and continuity; the fact that they have a nearly identical style only strengthens that. It's a direct follow-up of the Divine's next steps after destroying the Demon of Lies and saving the baby, which becomes Damian. The Divine Order is born, Lucian kills Damian's love Ygerna who's a member of the Black Ring and wants to awaken D's inner power, D gets mad, Lucian still doesn't dare to kill him, D's imprisoned in a different world etc. etc. ... Doesn't matter, it's all explained in the novella "The Child of Chaos".
In the end, Damian is free again and roams Rivellon.
Then begins the storyline of Ego Draconis. Damian corrupts the dragons to kill Lucian... - wait, dragons?! B-but... where's muh Souarce?!
Yeah, exactly, the idea of Source is only an addition since DOS1, which we all know plays thousands of years in the past, long before the Divine came into being. Does DD and BD mention it? Nope. Braccus Rex? Hah, nah!
And then begin the most glaring problems. DOS2 plays in the time where Lucian died. Same timeline as in Ego Draconis. Did he die by dragons? No. No mention of them, neither the Dragonslayers nor Dragon Knights are anywhere to be seen. Source is surely mentioned, though. Apparently Damian has been killed as well.
Thus Ego Draconis has been made entirely pointless from a lore perspective. I'm not someone to oppose additions and new ideas, but ignoring one game's entire lore? That's... a bit mad, I must say. I've never seen an official statement that explains those changes as well. That's why I wondered if I should seperate the stories of DOS1 and 2 from the Divinity saga.
Last edited by Lindworm; 23/09/17 04:03 PM.
